Browse real delivery work by industry, category and entry project to find a field case you can apply.
Cases are licensed only for limited web display and are not covered by CC BY-SA 4.0. Copying, republication, bulk extraction, model training or commercial use requires written permission from the rights holder.
E-commerce detail pages hand-templated — fast-paced, high-volume, judgment hard to teach.
5000+ KOS accounts, one voice required — without sounding identical.
Cardholders, merchants and partners need continuous engagement beyond human capacity.
High-ticket lab-grown diamonds, non-standard SKUs, deals hinge on senior sales judgment.
Founder information overload; top operators' renewal judgment impossible to clone.
Night enquiries unanswered; moments-driven sales depended on a few star sellers.
Massive daily enquiries; follow-ups tracked by hand.
Repetitive Q&A consumed the TA team.
Late-night enquiries and cabin checks on high-ticket bookings.
On-sale moments across world tours impossible to watch.
The enquiry-to-booking funnel kept leaking.
High-frequency benefits questions consumed HRBP capacity.
Payroll checks and bank-file preparation were slow and error-sensitive.
Schedules, vendors and production assets were coordinated manually across teams.
Coordinating talent calendars required repeated manual outreach.
Departmental AI pilots lacked a shared runtime, permissions and governance layer.
Writing tests and running full regression suites were slow and difficult to audit.
Cutouts, layouts and multi-size exports relied on repetitive manual work.
Brand assets moved through a slow serial workflow, taking 1–2 days per item and relying on outsourcing during peaks.
Regulatory, clinical and technical translation was high-volume, confidential and costly to outsource.
The previous open-source platform covered only API tests, while manual scheduling left each test task averaging one week.
Leads, experience, product knowledge and pricing rules were scattered, leaving proposals dependent on individuals.
Requirements changed across meetings, transcripts and files, causing omissions and version drift.
Configuration and quotation relied on manual work, while versions drifted across documents.
Quoting across more than ten thousand SKUs was slow and dependent on experts.
Complex hundred-page tenders created disqualification risk through omissions and structural errors.
Video production and media buying were disconnected from transaction data.
Candidates were split across channels, while sourcing and personalized outreach were maintained manually.
The team relied on scattered viral posts and could not turn signals into reusable creative inputs.
Content operations stopped, business data was fragmented and the team lacked stable roles and SOPs.
Order, lab-dip and quality data was locked across core systems, leaving queries to IT and traceability to veteran staff.
Product, design, channel and regulatory teams repeatedly reviewed the same packaging with rules buried in chats and experience.
Store staff spent one to two days reconciling mall statements against internal systems while recurring discrepancies went undetected.
Handwritten logistics labels were difficult to capture, inventory was fragmented and ads kept spending against out-of-stock products.
Reporting, training, order progress and capacity data across subsidiaries and production lines depended on paper-based monthly consolidation.
Trade inquiries, purchase orders and routine questions required manual replies and repeated data entry.
Municipal information arrived through multiple channels, making classification, incident decisions, alerts and reporting slow.
Acquisition, quoting, review, warehousing, transport, settlement and support were split across systems and manual steps.
Reference material was fragmented across documents, making topics, fact-checking, articles and video scripts difficult to reuse.
Quoting required two people to inspect DWG drawings and calculate materials and processes over two days.
Product files used inconsistent formats and fields, requiring manual pricing, completion and repeated publishing.
Multilingual ordering, delivery, replenishment, staffing and finance were fragmented across manual processes and tools.
Production engineers lacked a shared method for applying generative AI to real process improvement.
Academic affairs, student services, procurement and HR lacked consistent generative-AI practices and guardrails.
Editorial and marketing teams wanted reusable AI agents, skills and review workflows for campus content.
Regional leaders needed business-grounded AIGC workflows for market access and hospital engagement.
Drug-development teams needed a repeatable way to monitor clinical trials and frontier research.
Researchers faced high volumes of office material and papers without reusable AI methods for analysis and productivity.
Employees had tried AI tools but could not embed them into daily work.
Discord support volume was high and the initial knowledge system was inaccurate.
Multilingual tickets suffered from inconsistent terminology and routing.
Users submitted mixed screenshots, images and text that required cross-system investigation.
Recurring reports required manual data pulls, analysis and writing.
Risk signals were fragmented and escalation criteria varied by operator.
Data had to be re-entered across web and desktop tools without stable APIs.
Ad platforms required continuous creative variants across sizes and copy.
Content localization suffered terminology drift and heavy review cost.
Topics, scripts, review and distribution depended on a few core operators.
Department knowledge was scattered across many repositories and documents.
AI demand spanned departments without a common prioritization or product path.
School diligence and principal profiles constrained expert capacity.
The group needed internal builders, not one-off tool training.
A diverse group needed practical AI methods tailored to real roles.
Project knowledge was scattered across files and hard to reuse.
Application demand grew faster than conventional development could serve.
Support, parts approval and issue traceability were slow across systems.
Complex custom orders fragmented production, quality and delivery data.
Student services were fragmented across departments and systems.
After-sales data and actions were fragmented across systems.
Production, safety and quality teams lacked adaptable digital tools.
Support requests were hard to qualify and slow to route into product decisions.
Hazard reporting, remediation and traceability relied on offline coordination.
Order entry, lookup and follow-up were repetitive and fragmented.
Membership across WeCom, communities and the mall lacked a unified growth loop.
Member communities lacked engagement and a repeatable referral loop.
Mini-program sales were low without a predictable member campaign rhythm.
Trust-based services depended on individuals across content, community and sales.
Content, membership and commerce needed a connected operating system.
High-value relationships required long-cycle, traceable service operations.
An established content brand needed a repeatable WeChat Channels operation.
A content account needed to expand into a matrix and commerce model.
Engagement, product supply and service were fragmented across operations.
The private domain lacked consistent content, member interaction and repurchase operations.
Qualification bids required finding fields in long PDFs and repeatedly assembling Word files.
Enquiries, procurement, payments, FX, logistics and profit lived in separate tools.
Order information and production coordination were manual and poorly scoped.
Service items and processes were fragmented without a unified digital plan.
Water-quality data and remediation lacked a continuous management workflow.
Expert content lacked a repeatable short-video growth system.
A new account needed positioning and a scalable growth cadence.
Public content growth needed a sustainable private-domain conversion loop.
Project and land data across cities was slow to collect and difficult to compare.
Auction listings were fragmented and project questionnaires and reports were manual.
A manager searched multiple tender sites daily and still missed opportunities.
Nontechnical roles needed to turn AI concepts into usable job skills.
The company wanted to move from broad AI literacy into operational transformation.
Mixed-format enquiries and product matching depended on veteran staff.
Night-shift data was scattered across equipment, sheets and chat messages.
Store, wholesale, inventory and performance data were fragmented.
Qualifications, specs, quality material and sales SOPs were fragmented.
Client background, wealth, intent and service paths depended on individual advisers.
Job seekers used fragmented tools for resumes, matching, interviews and assessment.
Franchise leads, approval, territory, opening and operations were fragmented.
Leads, visits, conversion and finance lacked a shared operating view.
Knowledge was scattered, store replies varied and customer follow-up lacked a system.
Weekly private-domain content needed stronger engagement without eroding trust.
A private-domain proposal needed to move into real delivery and outcome collaboration.
Content output and night support relied heavily on people.
Bookkeeping, error checks and close cycles required extensive manual review.
Order data moved across chats and sheets, slowing response and follow-up.
Production reports required cross-system data pulls and manual formatting.
Frequent store content depended on manual topics, scripts and publishing.
Support, operations, finance and trade had extensive repetitive cross-system work.
Order blocks, platform data, price audits and refunds repeated across departments.
Finance automation needed to scale from pilots into multiple business groups.
Share the brand, industry and current business problem. OpenFDE will identify a relevant certified FDE or team for a scoped conversation.
Submit a collaboration needApply to OpenFDE Fellows, certify your capability and progressively connect your public cases and project roles.
Apply to become a Fellow